|
VOLUME
29 ISSUE 5 |
October/November,
2001 |
| |
Protecting Your Company’s Secrets
n today's information age, many companies fear
losing trade secrets or other proprietary information. The
loss can occur in many ways. Secrets might be leaked by
a key employee who goes to work for a competitor, or they
might be stolen by a hacker. Even though you have legal
protection from this type of loss – thanks to the passage
of the Economic Espionage Act in 1996 – you need to fulfill
the requirements of the act before the feds will get involved.
The difficult part is meeting the legal definition
of a “trade secret.” In that regard, corporate information
must meet a specific set of criteria to qualify as a trade
secret. For the most part, you need to accomplish six steps:
-
Assess the availability of the information
outside the company.
-
Record who inside the company has the
information.
-
Institute a means to protect the secrecy
of the information.
-
Establish the value of the information.
-
Quantify the time and effort the company
put into developing the information.
-
Determine if much of the information could
be properly and easily acquired or duplicated by others.
Federal laws exist to help you protect your
company’s proprietary information from theft or misappropriation.
However, you need to take the proper steps to safeguard
the information, or federal protection will be lost.
|
|
Emergency
Phones in the Workplace
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) has had
a significant impact on how businesses deal with disabled
persons. Everything from walkways to means of egress to restrooms
to parking now must be ADA compliant.
There is,
however, one area that has received very little attention.
That is the need for emergency phones to be available to everyone.
If your business has not yet made this move, you’re not alone.
While the ADA does not provide a specific requirement, they
do say that emergency phones should be available for everyone
to use, regardless of disability.
One of the reasons for the lack of response is confusion
over what a proper system is. Phones for the disabled should
include built-in dialers, a device that communicates the user's
location to the person answering the phone, and visual notification
to the caller that the call has been received.
These requirements usually can be met with digital ID and
voice ID, both of which let the person answering the phone
determine the location of the caller. There are a number of
phone systems available that provide the basic system requirements.
Many also provide advanced features such as automatic redial,
voice announcer, operating temperature, polling features and
weather resistance. Research into available options is strongly
recommended.
|
Balancing Act: Internet Access and Productivity
The personal productivity of individual workers
has been greatly enhanced by utilization of the Internet.
Without the use of personal computers in general and, specifically,
access to the Internet, the remarkable advancements in productivity
that the U.S. has enjoyed over the past 10 years would have
been impossible.
However, like most productivity advancements,
there is a downside. One of the most formidable is abuse
of Internet access. The question really is this: How do
you regulate Internet usage without making the technology
useless?
 Here are some suggestions to maintain high productivity
without sacrificing the technology:
-
Draft and publish an Internet usage policy
(Acceptable Use Policy).
-
Issue each employee with Internet access
a copy of the policy.
-
Provide separate login identification
for each employee with Internet access.
-
Make certain all employees with computer
access realize that their Internet movements are not secret.
While it’s often difficult to know whether an
employee’s Internet time is “work-related,” the employer
must not become a policeman. The more restrictions that
are imposed and enforced, the more the value
of Internet access is eroded. The key issue at the end of
the day is whether the employee is getting the job done
and not placing the company at risk with his or her actions
on
the Internet.
|
Spammer Gets His Day in Court

Washington State’s landmark law aimed at curbing the use
of unsolicited commercial e-mail, commonly known as “spam,”
has withstood a State Supreme Court challenge. The State’s
Attorney General now can proceed with a pending case against
an Oregon man accused of spamming millions of people. In a
bit of irony, the Oregon man's e-mails were promoting a book
he wrote that taught people how to use spam for profit.
Washington’s new anti-spam law is designed to prohibit the
sending of commercial e-mails that contain misleading information
in the subject line or use a bogus return address. The law
allows fines of up to $2,000 per violation. It also lets consumers
and Internet service providers sue and collect as much as
$500 and $1,000 per violation, respectively.
The tough anti-spam bill has been hailed by business groups
who are tired of having to clear their e-mail boxes of hundreds
of unsolicited
e-mails daily. Scott Mueller, chairman of the Coalition Against
Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail (CAUCE) notes, however, that
“the nature of spam ensures that the problem will continue
as long as the Congress delays passage of federal anti-spam
laws.”
Moreover, financial service companies are concerned that
anti-spam
laws might restrict communications between banks and their
customers.
Regardless of who wins this debate, the fact that Washington’s
law has been upheld could mean that other states and even
the federal government may be spurred to take action. Stay
tuned.
|
Insuring Improvements
Many companies today rent premises from a third party – a
warehouse for extra finished goods or a retail sales outlet
in a strip mall, for example. Frequently those companies end
up modifying the premises to suit their specific needs. These
betterments and/or improvements normally become the property
of the landlord, regardless of who purchased and paid for
the actual work. However, the issue of insuring the betterments
and/or improvements is unresolved by this legal
ownership.
Insurance
coverage for this improvement is normally an issue that is
determined by the lease provisions. The logical approach would
be to have the landlord include the value of the improvements
in with his or her overall building values. If the landlord
does assume responsibility for insuring the improvements,
you also will want to modify the lease provisions to require
the landlord to repair or replace the improvements if they
are damaged or destroyed.
However, if the landlord is unwilling to purchase the coverage
and modify the lease provisions, you will need to purchase
the insurance protection. In this case, have the value of
the improvements added to your commercial property policy
and make certain that your property policy covers your “use
interest as tenant” in any improvements. You also will want
to make certain that a loss to the improvements will be paid
on a replacement cost basis. Most policies, however, will
convert to an actual cash value basis if repairs are not promptly
completed.
Our agency can assist you in this important area. Make certain
that you have the protection you need. Give us
a call.
|
Power Outages: Are You Ready?
Many energy experts predict that more states and, as a result,
more businesses across the U.S. will be facing energy shortages
for quite some time. Unfortunately, “fixes” to the problem
take time, and, if decisive action is not taken soon, this
problem could extend well into the next few years.
As business owners, there are steps you can take now to protect
your company against blackouts and/or voluntary power cutbacks.
You should develop a business continuity plan to help assess
the possible effects of power outages. The plan will formalize
your strategy to respond quickly to emergencies while maintaining
customer service. In the plan, you need to:
- Develop a communication system to maintain contact with
staff and customers in the event of an outage.
- Identify a source for emergency lighting and power resources,
such as emergency generators.
- Address facility issues such as site security, evacuation
and safety procedures.
- Implement a formal shutdown procedure for all equipment.
- Protect equipment from loss of power, surges and voltage
fluctuations.
- Coordinate activities with local law enforcement, fire
and other emergency services.
Make certain to test the strategies that are developed. Find
out now if your insurance policy will cover a prolonged power
outage. Give us a call so that we can review this important
aspect of your insurance
protection.
|
| Newsletter
Archives |
| Disaster
Pre-Planning Helps
While it is impossible to completely protect against
the consequences of natural disasters, having a properly
designed disaster-recovery plan can greatly reduce the
disruption caused by a disaster. Common elements:
- Risk Assessment. Complete an assessment of your business
to determine potential damage from natural disasters.
- Processing and Operations Priorities. Develop plans
to handle the critical needs of your organization.
- Recovery Team. Develop a list of employees (and their
skills) who can be mobilized in the event of disaster.
- Data Collection. Review computer
hardware and software requirements, including backup
for essential records and replacements.
- Recovery Procedures. Outline the procedures and identify
those individuals that will perform each task.
- Test the Plan. Make certain that the plan works by
performing drills throughout the year.
Copies of a company’s disaster recovery plan should be
provided to key management personnel. And copies should
be available at offsite storage facilities and should
be filed with the local fire department and other emergency
facilities so they know what to expect.
By taking appropriate steps, you can greatly improve
your company's chance for a quick return to business following
a disaster
|
| |
| Beware of Punitive Damages
The U.S. Court System has utilized the concept of punitive
damages for years. The concept is quite simple: For companies
found guilty of egregious crimes, the courts can assess
an additional amount of compensation to be awarded to
a plaintiff as punishment for those acts, over and above
the normal monetary settlement.
Two highly visible cases have brought the “egregious”
clause of the law into the spotlight.
- Stella Liebeck became world-famous when a court awarded
her $2.7 million in punitive damages. Liebeck suffered
third-degree burns when she attempted to remove a lid
from a cup of coffee and it spilled in her lap.
- Almost as well known was a $4 million punitive damage
award in BMW of North America v. Gore. In this case,
the award was made because BMW did not advise Gore that
it repainted a section of his new BMW that was damaged
in shipping.
Is there a solution to these punitive damage problems?
One option to which a number of insurance experts point
is alternative dispute resolution (ADR). The ADR approach
offers a number of advantages for the defendant. These
include flexibility, lower transactional costs and potentially
swift resolution. The most important benefit to the defendant,
however, is confidentiality: ADR settlements are not made
public and, thus, cut down on adverse publicity. While
not all situations lend themselves to an ADR approach,
most cases could be settled this way.
We will be happy to review your general liability policy.
Just give us
a call. |
| |
| Are You Liable for Someone Else’s
Acts?
Business owners face an emerging exposure involving liability
for criminal acts of others that occur on your property.
Tort law has found that business owners have a duty to
protect customers and visitors against unreasonable risk
of physical harm. While all businesses have this risk,
common targets are apartment buildings, hotels/motels,
and retail stores.
Obviously, the key to mitigating this exposure is to
take measures to prevent foreseeable incidents. But this
isn't easy. As the owner, you cannot be held liable for
a crime-related loss unless you breach the duty to protect,
and that breach becomes the “proximate cause” of the injury.
The courts now have determined circumstances are foreseeable
if a prior, similar incident has occurred.
The courts also have established liability if the “totality
of circumstances” indicates you could have anticipated
the injury. The "totality" issue would include such things
as crime rate of the surrounding area, past complaints,
etc.
These losses normally are covered by premises liability
coverage. But they can be quite expensive, so it's clear
that adequate insurance limits are critical. We’ll be
glad to review your current program. |
| Newsletter
Archives |
| COPYRIGHT
© 2001. This publication is designed to provide accurate
and authoritative information in regard to the subject
matter covered. It is under-stood that the publishers
are not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other
professional service. If legal advice or other expert
advice is required, the services of a competent professional
should be sought. |
|
|
Request
for More Information
Employee Practices Liability
Insurance
Commercial General Liability
coverage
Commercial Auto insurance
Workers Comp coverage
Other Business Coverage
Contact
Us
|
| This article is reproduced, with permission,
from the "Business To Business" newsletter published
by Insurance Marketing and Management Services (IMMS). For more
information on IMMS and the online Newsletter Plus program,
visit the IMMS
Web site (http://www.imms.com) or call 800-753-4467. |
|
|
|
 |